![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
This caught my eye
http://www.orthoevra.com/landing/b.html
In the midst of the current debates/discussions/squawkings about birth control and abortion control, this caught my eye. It's a patch instead of a pill, and the patch lasts for a week at a time. You use it for three weeks, (one a week) and then go without for the fourth week. Nifty, easy to use, and no problems fogetting to take the pill at the same time the same minute the same place every day. :-)
I still believe that hormone methods of controlling birth are unhealthy, but that is a personal view, and I fully support the choice of any one who wishes to use *ANY* form of birth control they can lay their hands on. I will point out, it is NOT the practicioner's duty to impose their own morals; rather it is their duty to lay out all possible facts and figures fairly and objectively, and allow the victim er patient to make their own choice. After all, I've yet to find a mechanic who refused to work on my 121 because it was a Mazda, why should Drs in America be allowed to refuse someone aid because they have different views? *grin* I vote that any one who does believe they should be allowed to do so, be beaten to death with a stick before they spawn again. How does that sound?
:-)
http://www.orthoevra.com/landing/b.html
In the midst of the current debates/discussions/squawkings about birth control and abortion control, this caught my eye. It's a patch instead of a pill, and the patch lasts for a week at a time. You use it for three weeks, (one a week) and then go without for the fourth week. Nifty, easy to use, and no problems fogetting to take the pill at the same time the same minute the same place every day. :-)
I still believe that hormone methods of controlling birth are unhealthy, but that is a personal view, and I fully support the choice of any one who wishes to use *ANY* form of birth control they can lay their hands on. I will point out, it is NOT the practicioner's duty to impose their own morals; rather it is their duty to lay out all possible facts and figures fairly and objectively, and allow the victim er patient to make their own choice. After all, I've yet to find a mechanic who refused to work on my 121 because it was a Mazda, why should Drs in America be allowed to refuse someone aid because they have different views? *grin* I vote that any one who does believe they should be allowed to do so, be beaten to death with a stick before they spawn again. How does that sound?
:-)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 12:33 pm (UTC)From:I know quite a few people who hold the same position - that hormone methods of controlling birth ae unhealthy. I don't want to invalidate your position, because I think it's fine and have no argument with anyone's birth control position as long as it doesn't affect mine, but you have given me the opportunity to ask for more detail about it. Pretty please?
I completely understand if you don't wanna expose your views for further dissection.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 07:10 pm (UTC)From::-)
no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 04:24 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 09:48 pm (UTC)From:no periods for kat!!!!
:)
Anyway talk to jakie and sair about doctors refusing to perscribe the pill...